Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Members
    Members Only Area
    Member Directory
    Join the MA-AUA
  Annual Meeting
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Careers
  Newsletters
  Visit the AUA
  Advocacy Efforts
  MAAUA Research
  Scholarship
Didusch Museum
About the Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA)

 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?

 

67th Annual Meeting Abstracts


Novel Management of Inverted-Y-Ureteral Duplication
Jyoti Upadhyay1, *Amanda Burnette1, *Greg Spana2, *Margaret Roth2, Maryellen Sheridan, RN2, *Bijan Shekarriz1
1Children's Hospital of the Kings Daughter, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA;2University Hospital of New York, Syracuse, NY

Introduction:
There are no reported studies on the appropriate modality of detection of urinary incontinence caused by inverted-y-duplications. MRI/MRU (Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Urogram), with exam under anesthesia is the modality of choice for ectopic ureters in duplex systems. The best modality for detection of inverted-y-duplication, is not clear.
Materials & Methods:
We report on a series of five consecutive adolescent females (ages 14-17, mean 16) treated by one surgeon from 2002-2009 for refractory continuous urinary incontinence after lengthy negative diagnostic workup. High pressure vaginograms were performed with installation volumes ranging from 150-300cc diluted contrast with a large Foley catheter with the balloon inflated (20-30cc). Upon detection of inverted-y-duplication, laparoscopic excision was utilized.
Results:
In three of the five patients, high pressure vaginogram detected an inverted-y-duplication with ectopia to the vaginal forniceal cuff. In two of the five patients, vaginograms detected ectopic ureter of a duplex system. Two of the three inverted-y-duplications were treated laparoscopically with ectopic segment excision. One patient was lost to follow-up. Two patients underwent partial nephrectomy for poor functioning upper pole. All four patients who underwent surgery had complete resolution of urinary incontinence. In all three inverted-y-duplications, MRI/MRU failed to detect the anomalie.
Conclusion:
We report the first utilization of high pressure vaginogram in detection of inverted-y-duplications in a subset of patients with continuous urinary incontinence. We also present a novel, minimally invasive laparoscopic approach to the treatment of this anomalie. High pressure vaginogram and laparoscopy should be in the armamentary of treatment of inverted-y-duplication.


 

 

Copyright © 2012 Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.