Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA) Search MA-AUA
Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Members
    Members Only Area
    Member Directory
    Join the MA-AUA
  Annual Meeting
  Future Meetings
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Careers
  Newsletters
  Visit the AUA
  Advocacy Efforts

 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?

 
 

67th Annual Meeting Abstracts


Interstim II Implantable Generator Improves Surgical Time And Postoperative Pain After Neuromodulation

Stanley Zaslau, *Douglas Maxey, *James Namsupak, *Dale Riggs, *Barbara Jackson, Stanley J Kandzari
West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV

Introduction: Sacral neuromodulation (Interstim) is an FDA-approved treatment modality for refractory urgency/frequency, refractory urgency incontinence, and non-obstructive urinary retention. A new, smaller implantable generator (IPG) was FDA approved in August 2006. The purpose of this study is to present the authors’ experience with this new IPG.
Materials & Methods: Patients who underwent successful Stage II sacral neuromodulation with Interstim II were followed prospectively. All patients underwent upper tract evaluation, cystoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation before the Interstim Stage I procedure. Patients were deemed eligible for Stage II implantation if they demonstrated a 50% improvement in urinary frequency, urgency, and urgency incontinence. Patients with nonobstructive urinary retention were eligible for Stage II implantation if they demonstrated a significant reduction in need for self-intermittent catheterization, or were not using this modality and voiding on their own.
Results: The mean patient age was 46 years (n=58 females). All patients had refractory urgency/frequency or urgency incontinence. The operative time for Stage II implant was 22 minutes compared to 32 minutes for the prior larger IPG (Interstim I). Two patients (3%) had infections of their IPG. Eight patients with previously significant IPG pocket pain from the larger IPG were implanted with Interstim II. Their mean pocket pain score (scale 1-10) improved from eight with Interstim I to 2.5 with Interstim II.
Conclusions: Sacral neuromodulation with Interstim II improves surgical time and pocket-related pain compared with the larger Interstim I IPG. In addition, there is a low infection rate and no revisions have been required to date.


 

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2010 Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.