Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA) Search MA-AUA
Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Members
    Members Only Area
    Member Directory
    Join the MA-AUA
  Annual Meeting
  Future Meetings
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Careers
  Newsletters
  Visit the AUA
  Advocacy Efforts

 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?

 
 

67th Annual Meeting Abstracts


Are Urology Residents Adequately Exposed to Treatment Modalities for Small Renal Masses?
Vanessa L Elliott, *Paul H Smith, Jay D Raman
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA

Introduction: The increasing diagnosis of small renal masses (SRMs) necessitates urology trainees to be familiar with available therapies. We evaluated resident exposure to treatments and management patterns for SRMs.
Materials & Methods: The survey was distributed electronically to resident members of the American Urological Association (AUA) and queried exposure to ablation and surveillance for SRMs. Three case scenarios (SRM in a healthy 55 year old, healthy 75 year old, and comorbid 75 year old patient) were presented.
Results: 257 residents responded with equal distribution across AUA sections and levels of training. 234 (91%) reported ablation was offered at their institution; only 140 (54%) participated in this procedure. Of these, 80 (57%) were involved in fewer than 5 procedures. Experience with ablation did not increase with level of training (U3 - 61%, U4 - 66%, U5 - 63%). 224 (87%) residents noted exposure to surveillance for managing SRMs, increasing from 70% in U1 to 94% in U5. When considering case scenarios, management shifted significantly from extirpation to ablation or surveillance as the comorbidity profile increased. (Table 1).
Conclusions: While most residents have exposure to surveillance for SRMs, only 54% participated in ablation. Despite this lack of exposure, a significant percentage recommended ablation to manage SRMs in comorbid patients suggesting that training should be adapted such that urologists completing residency are better exposed to therapies they recommend.
Table 1: Resident responses to case scenarios of patients with SRMs (n=257 total)
Treatment55 year old Healthy
No. (%)
75 year old Healthy
No. (%)
75 year old comorbidities
No. (%)
Radical nephrectomy (open or lap)0 (0)2 (0.8)0 (0)
Partial nephrectomy (open or lap)251 (97.7)159 (61.9)40 (15.6)
Thermal ablation (RFA or Cryo; perc or lap)5 (1.9)69 (26.8)123 (47.9)
Active surveillance2 (0.8)21 (8.2)94 (36.6)


 

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2010 Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.