Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA) Search MA-AUA
Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Members
    Member Directory
    Join the MA-AUA
  Annual Meeting
  Future Meetings
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Newsletters
  Visit the AUA
 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?
 
 

2008 Annual Meeting Abstracts


Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Who Have Undergone Both Open and Laparoscopic Renal/Adrenal Surgeries
Compton J Benjamin, Mohammed A Atalla, H Brooks Hooper, Kevin B Blumenthal, W Marston Linehan, Gennady Bratslavsky, Peter A Pinto
Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Introduction:
Patients with hereditary renal and adrenal tumors often present with multiple, metachronous, bilateral masses. We, therefore, perform organ-sparing surgery whenever possible. In recent years we have progressed from open to minimally invasive surgery. As a result, some patients have experienced both open and laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery, which allows the opportunity to compare the perioperative outcomes of each approach.
Methods:
Ten patients underwent both laparoscopic and open renal or adrenal surgery. Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, number of tumors removed, estimated blood loss (EBL), time to advancement of diet, hospital stay, postoperative narcotic use, and surgical complications were compared.
Results:
Laparoscopic surgery showed a decreased number of tumors excised (2.38 vs. 4.89), increased operative time (460 vs. 318 mins), decreased EBL (550 vs. 1094 cc), and shorter hospital stay (2.38 vs. 7.78 days p = 0.01), but no difference in time to advancement of diet to regular (3.33 vs. 3.13 days). Narcotics use in the postoperative period was significantly lower after laparoscopic surgery (51 vs. 173.5 mg morphine equivalents p < 0.01). Three complications were identified in the open group (pleural effusion, rhabdomyolyis, and TIA) and one in the laparoscopic group (ileus).
Conclusions:
This patient cohort allows the comparison of open vs. laparoscopic surgery among individual patients. The shorter hospital stay, decreased narcotics use, and lower complication rate suggest that, if possible, laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery is a good alternative for patients requiring multiple procedures.


 

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2008 Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.