Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Members
    Members Only Area
    Member Directory
    Join the MA-AUA
  Annual Meeting
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Careers
  Newsletters
  Visit the AUA
  Advocacy Efforts
  MAAUA Research
  Scholarship
Didusch Museum
About the Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA)

 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?

 

2008 Annual Meeting Abstracts


Clinical Outcomes of Polypropylene Vaginal Mesh Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Jennifer Miles-Thomas, E. James Wright
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Introduction: To assess the anatomic and functional outcomes and morbidity of polypropylene vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift (Gynecare) system.
Methods: Forty-four patients had transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair by a single surgeon using the Prolift system between 5/2005 and 2/2008. Outcomes and complications were evaluated using the POP-Q and subjective assessment through retrospective chart review.
Results:
Forty-four patients underwent pelvic organ prolapse repair with the Prolift polypropylene mesh system between May 2005 and February 2008. The mean age was 63.8 years (range 40-84) at the time of repair. Mean follow-up was 22 weeks (range 1-77). Patients presented with Stage 2, 3, and 4 prolapse using POP-Q staging, 38.6%, 54.5% and 6.8% of the time, respectively. Hysterectomy was not performed as part of the repair irrespective of the degree of uterovaginal descent. All patients had restoration of pelvic support to stage 0 or 1 in all compartments post-operatively and at subsequent follow-up. To date, there have been no recurrences beyond stage 2. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged from the hospital within 23 hours. Mesh exposure through the vaginal epithelium occurred in 3 of 44 patients (6.8%) patients while dyspareunia occurred in 1 (2.3%).
Conclusions:
Polypropylene mesh offers a durable method of repair for pelvic organ prolapse as assessed in the near term. The procedure is minimally invasive with acceptable functional and anatomic outcomes.


 

 

Copyright © 2012 Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.