Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA) Search MA-AUA
Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Members
    Member Directory
    Join the MA-AUA
  Annual Meeting
  Future Meetings
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Newsletters
  Visit the AUA
 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?
 
 

Back to MAAUA Scientific Program
The Use of Color Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS) in the Evaluation and Treatment of Epididymitis in a University Based Health Care System
Chad R Tracy, Raymond Costabile
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Introduction: Scrotal ultrasound is not presently recommended in the CDC guidelines for evaluation of epididymitis. Our study evaluates the use of scrotal Color Doppler Ultrasound (CDUS) in patients with clinically diagnosed epididymitis across multiple specialties at a single academic institution.
Methods: From 1999 to 2005, 870 patients were diagnosed with epididymitis. Extensive review identified 480 patients with new onset epididymitis, of which 205 (42.7%) underwent scrotal ultrasound.
Results: 69% (142/205) of men with the clinical diagnosis of epididymitis had ultrasound characteristics consistent with epididymitis. 52% of the men under the age of 30 years underwent scrotal ultrasound compared to 38% of men over 30 years (p<0.01). Patients presenting to the emergency room were more likely to undergo scrotal ultrasound than patients presenting to family practice or internal medicine clinics (57% vs. 17%, p<0.001). Ultrasound characteristics most frequently associated with clinical epididymitis were a thickened scrotal wall (84.2%), abnormal epididymal echotexture (74%), increased epididymal vascularity (72.9%), and an enlarged epididymis (71.5%). Antibiotics were used for treatment in 95% of patients undergoing CDUS and 96% of patients without CDUS. Patients with normal scrotal ultrasounds were treated with antibiotics as often as those with ultrasounds positive for epididymitis (95% vs. 96%).
Conclusions: Ultrasound as a diagnostic adjunct to the clinical diagnosis of epididymitis is of little value. Treatment was not significantly altered by ultrasound findings. The use of CDUS in patients with an acute scrotum should be reserved for distinguishing spermatic cord torsion from epididymitis when the clinical picture is uncertain


Back to MAAUA Scientific Program

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2008 Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.