Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Members
    Members Only Area
    Member Directory
    Join the MA-AUA
  Annual Meeting
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Careers
  Newsletters
  Visit the AUA
  Advocacy Efforts
  MAAUA Research
  Scholarship
Didusch Museum
About the Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association (MAAUA)

 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?

 

Back to MAAUA Scientific Program
Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses
David A Kunkle*, Brian L Egleston*, Robert G Uzzo
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Introduction: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rising due primarily to incidental detection of small renal masses (SRMs). While surgical resection remains the standard of care for enhancing renal lesions, ablative technologies have emerged as minimally-invasive treatment alternatives. Cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been performed in selected patients via percutaneous, laparoscopic, and open approaches. In order to define the current data for ablation, we performed a meta-analysis evaluating cryoablation vs RFA as primary treatment for SRMs.
Methods: A MEDLINE search was performed reviewing the world literature for treatment of renal masses by cryoablation or RFA. Only studies examining clinically localized sporadic renal masses which provided information pertaining to disease recurrence/progression were included.
Results: 40 studies representing 1103 kidney lesions treated by cryoablation or RFA were analyzed (Table). While rates of local recurrence were significantly higher for RFA versus cryoablation(P<0.0001), there was no statistical difference in metastatic progression(P=0.26).
Conclusions: We demonstrate that ablation of SRMs is a viable strategy based on short- and intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. While extended oncologic efficacy remains to be established for ablation, our data suggests that cryoablation may result in significantly lower rates of local tumor recurrence compared to RFA.
Cryoablation versus RFA for treatment of enhancing renal masses.
CryoablationRadiofrequency AblationP Value
No. Series / Institutions19 / 1921 / 21-
No. Lesions496607-
Mean Age, years65.767.20.21
Mean Tumor size, cm2.562.690.18
Mean Follow-up, months18.316.40.61
Rate of Unknown or Indeterminate Pathology17.7%42.8%<0.0001
Rate of Malignancy (known pathology)75.8%88.3%<0.0001
Incidence of Local Recurrence4.6%11.7%<0.0001
Metastatic Progression1.2%2.3%0.26


Back to MAAUA Scientific Program

 

Copyright © 2012 Mid-Atlantic Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.